this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45724 readers
138 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] numlok@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Assuming this was around 1994, and adjusting for inflation, it should still be under $2.

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The beefy 5 layer burrito was introduced in 2009/10

[–] numlok@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

So, Ryan Gosling was 29 years old in the top picture. Damn is he a great actor.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Must be a method-actor.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

It's stitched together, it's not a taco bell ad, it's a meme.

[–] mihnt@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

til he's a year older than me

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Pic 2 also looks like uber eats, not instore

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

$3.99 in app for me rn. Total ripoff.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

It switches to $3.99 when I put it in my cart.

[–] indepndnt@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I found a picture of a taco bell menu from late 2023 showing the beefy 5-layer for $2.19.

https://www.reddit.com/r/tacobell/comments/180gjxn/whats_your_favorite_menu_item/

Is this how I embed this pic??

[–] NecroParagon@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I went through the drive thru last year and spent almost $20 on 3 beef chalupas. The cashier looked puzzled before she told me the total lol. The one thing I want from that place, I knew it would cost me.

Not worth it afterwards, I decided.

Goddamn I want a chalupa

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The whole supply chain increased their prices as well. Did you take that into account?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

By scaling entire price? Yeah.

[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

A Ryan Gosling appearance today is enough to warrant $5 for 5 layers.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The supply chain presumably cost something in the first pic too. The prices of those things should have also gone up according to inflation. So wouldn't they also be included in the "inflation adjusted" figure? It's not like they were calculating what it cost without needing a supply chain.

In fact, I would think that if anything, the overall price of supply chains would have decreased as technology got better (better fuel, better gas mileage, better routes, better forms of transportation, better computer models to predict outcomes, etc).

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Supposedly the argument for the recent absurd food prices is because of oil prices increasing (translates to shipping costs increasing) so much with Russia invading Ukraine and everyones sanctions on Russian oil plus the disruption of wheat production in Ukraine.

And then there's just plain old fucking greed.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FWIW prices are really high now here in America too, and we weren't relying on Russian oil.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oil has a single price on the global market, doesn't matter if you're in the US or Europe.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As it turns out, moving oil across the ocean is really expensive. Even if you can buy oil at the same price in the US and Europe, it's still cheaper to buy it locally and not have to deal with moving it.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That's only taking into account monetary devaluation, not inflation of goods and services

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Monetary devaluation is the only thing that gives any thin-veiled justificstion for price increases. Anything not covered by the inflation calculator is greed.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago

The inflation calculation is gamed too to make numbers look smaller

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

You mean greed

[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What?

Monetary devaluation is an economic policy Inflation is literally the "general increase in the prices of goods and services"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devaluation

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Inflation is market derived and does not include devaluation of the currency, source is your own link on deflation.

In a global economy goods and services are sourced internationally and are subject to various exchange rates. Rarely anything is ever 100% domestic

[–] flames5123@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even if every ingredient doubled in cost (same as domestic inflation) and profit is a 1/6 of the burrito, we wouldn’t even be at $4. This is corporate greed.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Seems like it's uber eats in the second pic so yeah a lot more markup?

Energy costs many times what it did too

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Energy costs many times what it did too

Perhaps for the consumer, not for the energy providers

What costs more? Gas or wind? Oil or solar? Coal or wave?

There's a premium charged for new technology, sure. To cover R&D costs, new tooling, etc, but once the machinery is made, the fuel is essentially free. The wind blows itself, the sun has its own fuel, the tides move freely

Energy arbitrarily costs more because those that sell it have decided it costs more. Aka corporate greed, which is what this post is complaining about in the first.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago

No, for one energy has gone up due to increased demand for fossil fuels after cutting Russian gas off