this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
3371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

These will be useless for EV's, but great for storage. They aren't energy dense enough for what the EV market needs.

Samsungs solid state EV batteries are currently the only positive step towards EV replacement and production vehicles are set to start rolling out around 2027. They're supposed to be lighter, last more cycles, charge faster, more energy dense, and safer than current EV liquid lithium batteries.

The sodium ion batteries will be great for large scale solar storage and house/business solar storage. They should let someone build a solar powered house that could continuously run completely off grid without needing to use lithium batteries that would need replaced every 10 to 15 years.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Why not? From what I've seen, they're about 75% as energy dense as lithium, and a lot cheaper. So if the Chevy Bolt gets 200-250 miles range on lithium batteries, I'd expect 150+ miles w/ sodium-ion, which is plenty for my commute. If the battery costs half as much and lasts 5-10 years, I'd buy that to replace my commuter in a heartbeat. Give me a commuter at $15-20k w/ 150 miles range and I'll buy.

[–] graymess@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Explain that to the average car buyer who sees the lower number and rules it out.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If they also see a lower price, they'll be more interested.

And this doesn't need to appeal to every car buyer, there's a market for budget-friendly cars with a narrow use-case. 150 miles is plenty for a second car, and would probably not appeal to people looking for a primary car, whereas 250 miles kind of bridges that gap. Segment the market and it should do well.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lower price and longer life.

50,000 complete cycles. That's 136 years of complete empty to complete full. Most of these will outlast their mounting hardware.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure. Drop them in budget cars, and when the cars are ready to EOL, move the batteries to energy storage.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

Yep. And decommissioning time? The sodium is all recyclable without major effort, and the Prussian Blue analogs can be discarded.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

These would also make bank as fleet vehicles for local deliveries or shuttle services.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

or you could also just, make a hybrid, which solves all of the problems, though it's a little more complex.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a lot more complex, and would drive up the price a lot. A simple EV with limited range has a lot of value for cases that only need short range.

i guess so but whats your argument for not just buying an older used prius instead

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

these batteries are a lot cheaper, and a lot more cycle resistant, which is what you primarily do for stationary storage, i think they're probably safer as well?

It would make some EVs cheaper, but they would have less range, and it's probably a little redundant considering you could just use less lithium ion batts instead.

Like the commenter said, we should be focusing on the solid state batts that samsung is fucking with, those are have REAL potential to be significantly better for EVs.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How can a battery be solid state, I don't understand what that means in this context.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You basically replace the liquid electrolyte with a solid one. Wikipedia article about it.

Here's an article about Samsung's battery, and I'm sure we'll hear a lot more about them in the coming years.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A solid state battery would likely be able to replace my family car, but I don't need that for a commuter, I just need the battery to be cheaply replaceable and enough range to get to work and back. I think we should be looking at both options.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i mean sure, personally i doubt it'll happen, im assuming they're focusing on developing better battery tech first and foremost, though im guessing sodium ions would probably make their way into EVs eventually.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They already are... in China. I'm saying we should do that here in the US. We have the battery plant, so let's put them in some inexpensive cars to replace commuters.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i dont think we've even broken ground on a sodium ion plant let alone making and production testing batteries for the market to begin with. I've got nothing aginst it, and EV manufacturers are probably going to do it, but whatever

Also you can buy a used prius for pretty cheap? The batteries aren't that expensive to replace if they go bad/are bad.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup, and I currently drive a Prius. I'm looking at used Bolts ($13-15k used), but I'm a little worried about fire risk (it'll be parked in my attached garage) and battery repair is going to be super expensive. A new sodium ion EV that's much cheaper (say, $15-20k) would be attractive, but I'm definitely not paying >$30k for a commuter.

yeah idk personally i feel like i would just live with the prius until i could get my hands on something truly more accessible to the market, which is inevitable at this rate.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't remember the name but I'm pretty sure some Chinese EV manufacturer has started to make EVs with salt batteries already.

[–] mysteryname101@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

BYD. Seagull or the seal. Can’t remember which one.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago

Sodium ion batteries on the market right now are about the same weight density as lithium poly batteries from a few years ago. It takes a few years for a newly manufactured battery to find its way into actual EV models. That means the newer sodium batteries have about the same performance as batteries in EVs right now. They're also cheaper and are made of more abundant materials.

Don't write off sodium batts in cars too quickly.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sodium ion batteries on the market right now are about the same weight density as lithium poly batteries from a few years ago. It takes a few years for a newly manufactured battery to find its way into actual EV models. That means the newer sodium batteries have about the same performance as batteries in EVs right now. They're also cheaper and are made of more abundant materials.

Don't write off sodium batts in cars too quickly.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The factory making these is still like 6 years out. The ones on market are like 65% energy dense, and lithium tech has only gained a few percent a year, so I don't know where you're getting your thoughts from. For EV'S, sodium ion is going to be a far shot behind solid state. By the time sodium could catch up to being close to today's lithium batts, solid state will be far cheaper and have a huge power density advantage.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Volkswagen id4 today has a battery of 168 wh/kg:

https://www.batterydesign.net/vw-id-4-82kwh-battery/

CATL launched a 160 wh/kg sodium battery in 2021:

https://www.catl.com/en/news/665.html

They are already gearing up for production of 200 wh/kg sodium batteries, and in talks with automakers about it:

https://www.electrive.com/2024/05/06/catl-gears-up-for-next-gen-sibs-and-global-licensing/

If the id4 on sale now has enough range for you, then a sodium ion version will give the same while being cheaper and having fewer fire concerns. Solid state lithium will be nice, but expect them in more expensive models.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even if they manage to "gear up" and make it to 200 wh/kg, that's years away and TODAY lithium EV batts are hitting 270 wh/kg. 35% more energy dense.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And you'll spend more money to get that. Not every EV needs the most capacity out there.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago

If your ev isn't good enough for a road trip, that means for like 90% of you have to own another vehicle.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

and lithium tech has only gained a few percent a year

isn't it about an 8% improvement year on year historically?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I double checked. It looks like about 5% per year.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

yeah that seems about right, it's still pretty good though.

Over 10 years that's 50% more capacity compared to older cells.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago

It's actually been about 8% in recent years, but historically 5%. We'll see which one holds, but either compounds to doubling capacity in shorter time than you might think.