this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

923 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

As one Subaru Crosstrek owner recently learned the hard way, it bears repeating that all-wheel drive is not the same as four-wheel drive. A Subie owner posted a warning letter they received a month after driving on Colorado River Overlook Road in Canyonlands National Park to the r/NationalPark subreddit. The letter notes that this particular road is restricted to 4WD vehicles only, and the Crosstrek is equipped with AWD, not 4WD. It also warns that they may face serious consequences if they’re caught taking an AWD car on a 4WD-only trail again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

If you have 4 wheels, logically 4WD is AWD. Why not just say you need to have a locking diff?

[–] SpaghettiYeti@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Subaru has x-mode for difficult terrain, which is different gearing. They also have hill descent. https://www.sportsubaru.com/subaru-x-mode.htm

Why would you want 4wd with wasted energy then you could have a symmetrival awd and get all the power to wheels that have traction, skipping those that don't have traction?

I only see awd outperform 4wd when it comes to a subie, but other awd systems from other manufacturers are probably not up to snuff.

[–] legion02@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Isn't that the technical distinction between awd and 4wd? Why create a new definition when one already exists?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

They do say that.

[–] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

It's honestly more of a clearence issue, but either way it is most definitely a driver issue. If u aren't skilled it doesn't matter what ur driving, I've seen idiots in rental Jeeps with foot plus clearence high center on obstacles that aren't really that challenging

[–] OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The rule defined the requirements and explicitly called out the difference between 4WD and AWD.