Asklemmy

43945 readers

985 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Should an altruistic organ donor be allowed to restrict their donation to a specific group of people? (e.g. women, gingers) (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by night_of_knee@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An extreme version of this is: What should the German health service do if someone says they are willing to donate a kidney as long as it doesn't go to a Jew?

On the one hand, nobody is forced to donate a kidney and by forbidding this we're making things worse for an innocent patient. On the other hand, it can be seen as the state sanctioning this kind of discrimination.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Women, no. Gingers, yes. Jews, no.

Being ginger is not a protected class, so there is no legal restriction on descriminating (so long as you don't successfully argue that gingers are a race, eg Scottish, but that's a stretch).

However morally no, you shouldn't have a say in it. Either way, usually you'll be dead when the decision is made. Maybe not with kidneys, although with kidneys you tend to know who you're giving it to - I don't think anyone just randomly donates a kidney, like you would give blood.

[–] night_of_knee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t think anyone just randomly donates a kidney, like you would give blood

You would be wrong about that, in 2021 more than 450 people in the US anonymously donated a kidney to a non-familiy member (source). This is the scenario I'm asking about. One of the arguments given is that just as we allow monetary donations to specific groups of people, why not organs.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think the conditions of anonymously giving it away would preclude the ability to discriminate. You'll likely have to sign something saying as much.

[–] NeoLikesLemmy@lemmy.fmhy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the scenario I'm asking about.

Nobody knew your scenario before you explained it in detail. It is simply not happening.

Organisations don't want to be bothered with such restrictions from a donor. Their principles are: fair and anonymous. It is hard enough already this way.

[–] night_of_knee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody knew your scenario before you explained it in detail.

I thought that "altruistic organ donor" was a well understood concept, I was wrong.

It is simply not happening.

You're factually wrong on that aspect.

[–] NeoLikesLemmy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I was wrong

So, what does it tell you?

You're factually wrong on that aspect.

Because of 450 cases in some foreign country? Don't be ridiculous.

[–] TechDiver@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What about a living donor who decides to give a kidney or part of the liver?