this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

dailygames

938 readers
72 users here now

Community for daily games like Wordle, Jumblie, Connections etc.

Post your daily games and scores. Discover new games and discuss with others.

Find games

Share your results

It’s useful to wrap your results in a markdown codeblock to preserve the layout. Put three backticks ``` before and after your result to create a codeblock.

πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨β¬›β¬›β¬›
πŸŸ¨πŸŸ©β¬›β¬›β¬›
πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨β¬›
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Rules

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emotional_Series7814@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

spoilerIn that case I wonder what they mean by

Categories will always be more specific than "5-LETTER-WORDS," "NAMES" or "VERBS."

Given that they actively do a thing where they assign one word to several categories, only one of which is in the puzzle, and the others are red herring categories that do not have four entries, they probably should realize that the most obvious category for these three words is "meta-information about the words" and been a lot more clear with their meaning.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago

They obviously think this is more general than those ones they say they won't do.

As another example, we've definitely seen ones that are "homophones" before (I can't remember the specific example, but think: "there", "their", "they're"), and I think we've even seen one as simple as "rhymes", where all 4 words rhymed with each other. Is that more specific than the ones they said they wouldn't do? I dunno. I've never liked that type of category personally, because yeah, it definitely seems pretty unspecific to me.