this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
3873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It ran functionally uncontested for ten years. And it would hardly have been the first underground streaming service to pivot legit and cash out.

Napster was sold for $85M back in 2002. Justin.tv rebranded as Twitch in 2011. Hell, AWS has it's share of pirate hosted files.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but megaupload was legit but was still shutdown despite being massive

[–] viking@infosec.pub 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They had their servers seized, but were later returned and the service came back as mega.nz, legit and all.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Yeah uh no. that's not the whole story, Mega is a new company, the difference is it's encrypted so the theory was they'd have no way to scan for pirated content. Mega was also seized people think, it's unclear who or what currently opperates it. And Kim Dotcom's extradition case is ongoing.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Yeah uh no. that's not the whole story, Mega is a new company, the difference is it's encrypted so the theory was they'd have no way to scan for pirated content. Mega was also seized people think, it's unclear who or what currently opperates it. And Kim Dotcom's extradition case is ongoing.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Wait, is that actually Twitch's history - Justin.tv?

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is. Until recently it actually still used the domain to serve assets.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Wild. What an obscure piece of internet history to have missed out on as an old Justin.tv user.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Was Justin.tv doing copyright infringing things? I seem to remember it was just a guy streaming his everyday life. He would literally wear a hat with a camera on it and record everything he did all day. It makes sense that it became twitch because they solved a technical problem around mass streaming that empowers twitch today.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I remember watching Pay-tv (Premier League / Bundesliga matches) on Justin TV back in the day, when it was still obscure enough to not attract the copyright holder's attention. That was definitely infringing.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I see.. I only remember the very early days of Justin.tv and kind of lost track of it between then and when it became twitch.