Asklemmy

43945 readers

1028 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

-9

Will China beat America in the artificial intelligence race? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 7 months ago by AmerikaLosesWW3@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They say that he who creates AGI will control the entire world. I wouldn't want America to dominate earth with their misaligned AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

whereas China committed none

That is... a very bold statement there.

[–] AmerikaLosesWW3@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

China doesn't plunder, invade, or bomb like America does. China prefers to build and cooperate with other countries. Win-Win relationships are China's thing instead of zero-sum games like America.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The relationship they had with the country I grew up in was not like that, it was more like pay off corrupt politicians, so China can economically exploit it. Same with Russia. What you're saying is just the Chinese party line, the equivalent of the "US only ever brings democracy" BS. They are both BS, of course, they both serve their own interests.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The relationship they had with the country I grew up in was not like that, it was more like pay off corrupt politicians, so China can economically exploit it.

[Citation needed]

There is a difference between an imperialist state like the US and an anti-imperialist — and until recently imperialized — state like China.

The US has over 750 overseas military bases around the world, and is building more to further encircle China. Meanwhile China has one anti-piracy base in Djibouti.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl -1 points 7 months ago

I'm not talking about philosophically, I'm talking about China paying off my country's politicians to build massive infrastructure projects benefiting only China, from money lent from China, by companies from China. Or the same deal happening with overpriced rail cars bought from Russia, that are not performing even comparably better than the French ones we could have bought for much, much cheaper.

My country mostly faces no US pressure except when it's blocking NATO or EU proceedings, to the chagrin of all the other member states. Even then, the government could do what it wanted, no matter how stupid. Worst thing they did was pay less of the free money that they were paying to help us grow in the first place.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

It’s bold of the US to fund & organize terrorist attacks in Xinjiang and then fabricate a genocide narrative around it https://lemmy.ml/comment/10145782