this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
33 points (88.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43940 readers
977 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
These planets are not meant to be realistic. Venus is themed like classic scifi depictions before modern observations revealed it to be a hell planet. i.e it is a swampy jungle world with life that would belong in the era of Earth's dinosaurs.
Europa has a subsurface ocean that I plan to add primitive swimming mobs to.
Persephone (gas giant) has a moon orbiting it that sustains life via volcanic vents and the like. Completely dark but still full of life.
Mercury, Jupiter's other moons and titan are dead.
Mars could go either way. Either a dead planet that used to sustain life and no longer does or continues to sustain life but rarely and underground.
These planets and moons are supposed to be interesting and a completely realistic portrayal would not fit the pack's design goals.