Asklemmy

43940 readers

567 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

118

What is your favorite paradox or conundrum? I am partial to can god kill god? (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

291 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The monotheistic all powerful one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 8 points 8 months ago (5 children)

For some reason "The following statement is true." "The previous statement is false." has always tried to send my brain into an infinite loop.

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social -2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The problem with that particular paradox is that it's not possible. Therefore one of the statements has to be wrong.

[–] Susaga@ttrpg.network 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think you've quite clocked it. It's not that one of the statements has to be wrong, because that's just a point in the cycle. If A is wrong, then B is right, which means A is right, which means B is wrong, which means A is wrong and the cycle begins anew.

They aren't wrong, they're contradictory. There is no logical way to parse the two statements together. That's what a paradox is.

load more comments (2 replies)