this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
633 points (98.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
389 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

@selfhosted@lemmy.world

Mid 2022, a friend of mine helped me set up a selfhosted Vaultwarden instance. Since then, my "infrastructure" has not stopped growing, and I've been learning each and every day about how services work, how they communicate and how I can move data from one place to another. It's truly incredible, and my favorite hobby by a long shot.

Here's a map of what I've built so far. Right now, I'm mostly done, but surely time will bring more ideas. I've also left out a bunch of "technically revelant" connections like DNS resolution through the AdGuard instance, firewalls and CrowdSec on the main VPS.

Looking at the setups that others have posted, I don't think this is super incredible - but if you have input or questions about the setup, I'll do my best to explain it all. None of my peers really understand what it takes to construct something like this, so I am in need of people who understand my excitement and proudness :)

Edit: the image was compressed a bit too much, so here's the full res image for the curious: https://files.catbox.moe/iyq5vx.png And a dark version for the night owls: https://files.catbox.moe/hy713z.png

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd recommend using Borgbackup over SSH, instead of just using rclone for backups. As far as I know, rclone is like rsync in that you only have one copy of the data. If it gets corrupted at the source, and that gets synced across, your backup will be corrupted too. Borgbackup and Borgmatic are a great way to do backups, and since it's deduplicated you can usually store months of daily backups without issue. I do daily backups and retain 7 daily backups, 4 weekly backups, and 'infinite' monthly backups (until my backup server runs out of space, then I'll start pruning old monthly backups).

Borgbackup also has an append-only mode, which prevents deleting backups. This protects the backup in case the client system is hacked. Right now, someone that has unauthorized access to your main VPS could in theory delete both the system and the backup (by connecting via rclone and deleting it). Borg's append-only mode can be enabled per SSH key, so for example you could have one SSH key on the main VPS that is in append-only mode, and a separate key on your home PC that has full access to delete and prune backups. It's a really nice system overall.

[–] 7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're right, that's one of the remaining pain points of the setup. The rclone connections are all established from the homelab, so potential attackers wouldn't have any traces of the other servers. But I'm not 100% sure if I've protected the local backup copy from a full deletion.

The homelab is currently using Kopia to push some of the most important data to OneDrive. From what I've read it works very similarly to Borg (deduplicate, chunk based, compression and encryption) so it would probably also be able to do this task? Or maybe I'll just move all backups to Borg.

Do you happen to have a helpful opinion on Kopia vs Borg?

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I haven't tried Kopia, so unfortunately I can't compare the two. A lot of the other backup solutions don't have an equivalent to Borg's append-only mode though.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm a borg guy. I'd never heard of kopia. This is from their docs though:

Each snapshot is always incremental. This means that all data is uploaded once to the repository based on file content, and a file is only re-uploaded to the repository if the file is modified. Kopia uses file splitting based on rolling hash, which allows efficient handling of changes to very large files: any file that gets modified is efficiently snapshotted by only uploading the changed parts and not the entire file.

So looks like they do append only.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What I mean by "append-only" is that the client can't delete the backups. I don't think Kopia supports that.